PRESS STATEMENT TUN DR MAHATHIR
1. On June 10, The Borneo Post reported Judge Ian Chin’s “explosive judicial disclosure”, about how judges were threatened and sent to Boot Camps by the former Prime Minister.
2. He made these revelations prior to hearing a case, apparently to avoid being accused of bias.
3. What he did not reveal is that there is a police report against him for breaches of Judge’s Code of Ethics in hearing a case in which he has a personal interest. He presided on a case involving Dato Syed Kechik without revealing that he believed Syed Kechik was responsible for detaining his father and brother 20 years before.
4. Chin joined Party Berjaya and lost twice. One of the objectives listed in Party Berjaya’s manifesto was to expel Syed Kechik from Sabah. (Syed Kechik akan dikeluarkan dari Sabah). As a party member he must know Berjaya’s hatred for Syed Kechik. This alone should have resulted in him excusing himself from hearing the case.
5. However, both the Claimants and Defendants in the hearing in 1999 did not seek to change the judge, believing that his being a Party Berjaya candidate would not affect his judgement.
6. It was only later that the defendants learnt about the detentions of his father and brother by the Tun Mustafa Government and that Ian Chin believed Syed Kechik was instrumental in getting his father and brother arrested.
7. John R Cherryman Q.C., lawyer for Dato Syed Kechik (DSK) in a written opinion after Chin J’s ruling of September 2, 2004, said inter alia “Looking at these matters in retrospect there emerges a pattern redolent of bias”.
8. Cherryman went on to say; “Knowing what we do now, the inference was that the Judge (Chin J) was throughout determined to have revenge against DSK (and corporate Defendants) for his (Dato Syed Kechik’s) alleged part in the detention of his family members.
9. When Party Berjaya won the State elections in April 1976, the Berjaya Government cancelled Syarikat Banita’s (belonging to Syed Kechik) timber license and on 1st October 1976 published Gazette Notification No 671 on compulsory acquisition of the whole of Zara Project Land of 2,452.74 acres also belonging to Syed Kechik.
10. On 7th September 1977 Banita filed a civil suit against the State Government and on 28th September 1977 Zara filed for the adjudication of compensation claim in respect of compulsory acquisition of its land for “public purpose”.
11. The Sabah Government through the Sabah Foundation, Suiswan Sdn Bhd and Seranum Sdn Bhd filed counter claims against DSK, Zara Sdn Bhd and Banita Sdn Bhd.
12. For about 20 years the Plaintiffs and their Solicitors went to “sleep”. No court action was taken.
13. Then on October 29th 1996 Justice Tee Ah Siang heard the case involving Originating Summons No 69 of 1977. The judge ordered the payment of RM40,920,011.00 in capital compensation by the State Government to Zara Sdn Bhd with 6 % per annum interest from 20th December 1976 to date of settlement.
14. Then on 6th January 1997, Chin J granted ex-parte Mareva Injunction Orders against the Defendants in suit 351 and 352 in response to the Plaintiffs (Sabah Government) application.
15. The very next day Chin J instructed Registrar to set hearing of Suit 351 on 9th January 1997, i.e. three days after he granted injunction against the Defendants.
16. On 9th April 1997 he delivered judgement on Strike Out Actions, refusing to grant order in favour of Defendants (Zara Sdn Bhd).
17. On 5th February 1999 a joint hearing of Suits 351 and 352 was held before Chin J at the Kota Kinabalu High Court. On 6th September 1999 Chin J delivered his judgement in which he stated on pgs 122-125:
“Yes, DSK was from West Malaysia sent to Sabah supposedly to help Sabah politically. Unfortunately, he introduced to Sabah, especially to the then politicians of Sabah, a way to get rich, very rich at that, quickly by way which I have already concluded are wrong in law.”
18. Chin J also said in his judgement that “DSK wielded too much power for anyone to believe that any bureaucrat would oppose him”. He concluded with dismissing with cost the application of the 2nd Defendant to strike out the injunction.
19. It became obvious that Chin J was biased against DSK. Yet he did not reveal his father’s and brother’s arrest during the time of Tun Mustafa’s Government and his belief that Syed Kechik who was adviser to Tun Mustafa was responsible for this arrest when hearing the case concerned.
20. Following this a police report was made by Pengarah, Zara Sdn Bhd on June 16, 2005 on “Salahlaku Hakim Datuk Ian Chin Hon Chong”. (refer to salinan report and 1st page of police report)
21. The report went from Police to Chief Justice Malaysia to Ministers, to the Anti Corruption Agency, to Suhakam (Human Rights Commission) and even to the Prime Minister. No action was taken by any of them.
22. In the meanwhile the cases (DSK, Zara and Banita) went to the Federal Court and a judgement was made on March 25, 2008 and this is what the Federal Court has to say of Chin J’s High Court judgement in the Zara and Banita suits.
23. “Without evidence or justification, the learned Judge wrongly held that DSK made these decisions. We find that the learned Judge’s findings were based on unjustified inferences, speculation, his own preconceived impressions and prejudice…” and;
“We find the learned Judge’s attack on the credbility of SSA (Syed Salem Al-Bukhary , the younger brother of DSK - who represented his incapacitated brother) as unwarranted and does not stand up to examination having regard to the extremely prejudiced view he held about SSA’s conduct as apparent in his judgment.”
24. This Federal Court judgement is likely to come in support of the alleged “Salahlaku” by Chin J in the Police Report by Zara Sdn Bhd.
25. Action is now more likely to be taken against Chin J for breach of the ethical code of judges when he did not reveal his personal interest in the case he was hearing and not recuse himself.
26. His “explosive judicial disclosures” of June 7, 2008 came shortly after the Federal Courts judgment on Mar 25th 2008 and appears to be a desperate attempt ro deflect the legitimate complain against him by the Defendants of Civil Suits Nos 351 and 352 of 1979 which the Federal Courts’ decision seem to support.
27. The reference to the threats by the former Prime Minister and his being sent to a Boot Camp had nothing to do with the case he was about to hear or his previous hearing of a case in which he had personal interest. Refer to statement by Tan Sri Abu Talib Othman, former Attorney-General and current chairman of Suhakam.
28. It looks as if he was trying to curry favour with the Government by demonising the previous Prime Minister whom everyone knows is the bete noir of the present Government.
29. And he was quite right because Government Ministers and the Prime Minister rushed to accept his story as absolutely true. But other judges had refused to endorse his statement about threats by the Prime Minister casting doubt on its veracity. He now “slams a fellow judge in court” but he has not been able to condemn the other judges who also disagreed with him. The Boot Camp was of course not a Boot Camp at all. It was Kursus Tata Negara which had been attended by thousands of civil servants, business executives and politicians, without any complaints.
30. It will be interesting to see whether the Government would set up a tribunal to examine the charges against Ian Chin J.
31. I suspect that it will not. And so this judge who obviously breached The Judges Code of Ethics by “being a judge in his own cause” will simply get away with his unethical behaviour while presiding over a case.
32. The public should question how a person such as Ian Chin J should have been recommended to become a judge. I cannot remember recommending him. He is a disgrace to the judiciary and to the legal profession.
33. Now Chin has changed his accusation of “veiled threat” to “the former premier did not say he would remove judges through a tribunal in those exact words but conveyed the threat by “dropping words to that effect here and there”. I wonder what the words are. He will now be thinking and cooking up more stories.
34. This reflects the character of the man who presides over our courts and dispenses “justice”. He makes use of his position as a judge and the courts to take revenge for alleged actions against members of his family.
This is default description text on Padangan Themes, of course you can change this text via you profile administration.
June 29th, 2008 at 8:23 pm
Betapa angkuhnya YB ketika membuat statement di TV dulu takkala Ian Chin membuat tuduhan bahawa Tun ugut hakim. Nah sekarang YB Zaid terpaksa telan kata kata sendir yg bongkak dan angkuh. Tak malukah keluarga YB Zaid mendapat perangai saudara yg macam ini? Kalau padamlah YB sekarang sempatkah minta maaf dgn Tun? Kalau hati dah busuk inilah akibatnya. Apa lagi yang nak ditukar dgn perlembagaan? Kalau nak ucap terima kasih kat Pak Lah dan menantunya kerana dilantik jadi Menteri bukan begini caranya YB. Tak fikirkah bahawa keluarga YB pun mendapat malu.Sepatutnya cermin diri dulu ye.
Tun,
Saya juga ingin mencadangkan supaya diujudkan suruhanjaya bebas untuk menyiasat GLC yg ujud sekarang macamana GLC ini mengagihkan cadangan cadangan,projek projek besar mahu pun kecil kepada syarikat syarikat yang entah datang dari mana tiba tiba GLC bersetuju sahaja? Sebabnya kami rakyat juga ada peratusnya di dalam GLC tersebut. Kalau tak telus saya haramkan mereka memakan bahagian saya jika mereka ini berugama Islam.
Tun , kebenaran itu selalunya pahit bagi mereka yang tahu ianya benar samaada dipahak Tun mahu pun lawan. Teruskan Tun…sejarah akan menetukan kebenaran Tun.
salam.
By wanmin on June 27, 2008 5:34 PM
With this kind of characters as judges are the government sure the judiciary should be independence
These KIND OF CHARACTERS could bring down a democratically elected government overnight.It happen before,just because two party division is not registered the whole rulling party is declared illegal and a democratically elected leader is remove.
There must be a better check and balance system in running the country judiciary,a complete independance is vulnerable to abuse.H.J Chin case is the living proof.
By ray77light on June 27, 2008 5:34 PM
Dearest Tun
Truth always prevail.
It is NOW apparent that the AAB govt has some explanation to do.
Silence could mean “guilty as charged”.
Way to go Tun …
Those who know you, will always be on your side.
Semoga kesehatan Tun berpanjangan dan sentiasa dilindungi Allah.
By cariidea on June 27, 2008 5:36 PM
Assalamualaikum
Dalam kes ni ada penyangak yang dok defence dia..penyangak haram jadah tu tak lain Zaid serabut tu la. Berapa komisen dia dapat tah la yang dia dok sibuk defence hakim - hakim ni. Tak nampak satu pun kenyataan dia yang dok bela rakyat. PM bengong ni entah mimpi apa boleh p lantik dia p dok dalam parlimen. Haghu betoi. Baguih tengok cara Tun bagi penjelasan dalam berita, nampak rilek dan bersahaja. Tengok muka Tun bagi penerangan pun saya dah rasa ceria dan power. Baru padan muka dia, dia ingat Tun tak simpan fakta kot. Ajaq sama dia Tun…harap pasni Tun ajar Nazri botak tu sikit..samseng sangat dia ni..pastu pangge org lain samseng pulak. Kalau mai Aloq Staq nanti aku terbe ( lastik) kepala botak hang baru tau.
By malan3395 on June 27, 2008 5:37 PM
Dear Tun…,,
Dia dh kna kapur la.
Salah tempat mau tunjuk samseng.
Dh kta jgn jolok srang tebuan, ni kau jlok gak.
By Mentel on June 27, 2008 5:45 PM
Dear Tun,
COOL. Btw I guess Chin J will not only be thinking and cooking up more stories curry favour, he will be experiencing pissing here and there too !!
By sktan on June 27, 2008 5:45 PM
Dearest Tun, with such a dirty mindset, childish for using wrong platform, and unsound mind, He is actually hoping for a promotion from the hand that feed and understand the whole senario.
God please help this poor fellow, who is not even fit to teach kindergaden, get his wish. He is a laughing stock to the judiciary.
And to neil(Kneel the sound my dogs would obey to), take these: DEAREST AYAHANDA TUN, me and my family will always: LOVE,RESPECT,ADORE AND PRAY FOR YOUR GOOD HEALTH.
By malan3395 on June 27, 2008 5:48 PM
Dear Tun…,,
Sy ada tgk kt TV bl Tun buat press confrence psl hal ni.
Nk tegelak pn ada psl time tu la sy byngkn muka Chin tu mesti mrah padam. Tabik spring la Tun. Lg 1 Tun ada srang lg hakim yg dh dpt
duit ex-gratia trus dia kta Tun mcm ditaktor. Cb Tun bg brg sbji 2
kt dia. Time sy tlis ni pn sy msih nk tegelak lg ni mengenangkan Chin ni. Kuang kuang kuang…
By adam on June 27, 2008 5:49 PM
My heartfull congratualtions to Ayahanda.You are talking with facts and figures unlike to that cheapskate judge who is getting some emotional support from some of the so-called HAPRAK BN ministers.
Keep it up Ayahanda and I am sure you also have some other files for some of the so-called HAPRAK BN ministers.
Keep coming to Langkawi Ayahanda and you are part of this legendary island.
Note: Wondering where are those big political guys in the island whenever you are here???? Dulu masa ayahanda jadi PM depa lah paling hebat dan di depan sekali.
Syabas Ayahanda for your excellent leadership qualities.
Kam Nan,Koh Lipe
By Kak JaynAuthor Profile Page on June 27, 2008 5:57 PM
Such a coincedence….rupa-rupanya ada niat c ian ni nak minta cover dgn paklah….patutlah melalak cam……. The Naked Judge adalah nama baru yang sesuai. Nak mengenakan orang dengan niat yang jahat itulah balasannya….
By Melayu NusantaraAuthor Profile Page on June 27, 2008 5:58 PM
TUN,
KEBENARAN DAN KEIKHLASAN TUN DALAM MEMPERJUANGKAN AGAMA BANGSA DAN NEGARA, TIDAK DIRAGUKAN LAGI.
TUN KAMI MAHU BERTINDAK MELAKUKAN SESUATU,
TOLONG PERTIMBANGKAN USUL ASHAR DIBAWAH,
KALAU KAMI BERMINAT DALAM KOORDINASIKAN GERAKAN INI SEMALAYSIA, DIMANA KAH BOLEH KAMI MEMBINCANGKANNYA, KAMI SANGGUP TURUN DEMI AGAMA BANGSA DAN NEGARA.
POSTED DALAM : PERPADUAN
By ashar on June 25, 2008 7:51 PM
TUN yang di hormati dan sayangi,
Salam buat semua.
PERPADUAN dalam ertikata menurunkan Pak Lah.
PERPADUAN dalam ertikata mengantikan kepimpinan yang telah merosakkan negara.
PERPADUAN dalam ertikata suara rakyat boleh menukar kepimpinan yang lemah.
Sekarang apakah peranan kita semua yang menyokong PERPADUAN yang dikatakan TUN, agar Pak Lah mengundurkan diri.
Inilah tindakan yang kita perlu lakukan, walaupun nampak kecil namun kesannya adalah amat besar sekali.
Kepada ahli UMNO tunjukkan kuasa ahli anda dalam merubah kepimpinan. Pada bloger yang ahli UMNO dan bukan ahli, kita tunjukan sokongan kita pada TUN dengan mencari pengaruh sebanyak mungkin terutama pada orang terdekat kita.
Suara rakyat amat berharga sekali, kalau majority rakyat dah bersuara Pak Lah tiada pilihan lain lagi. Kita tunjukan suara rakyat berharga. Rakyat tidak akan bersuara tanpa ada kebenaran terhadap apa yang berlaku.
BAGAIMANA MEMATIKAN LANGKAH PEMIMPIN LEMAH YANG DEGIL @ KERAS KEPALA:
1. PENGARUH ONLINE:
a. Dalam kajian saya dalam blog TUN bulan lepas, sehari dengan purata 40,000 pengunjung, dan dalam bulan ini baru 22 hari purata pengunjung 65,000 pengunjung sehari. Ini akan bertambah lagi dalam masa terdekat ini.
b. Dengan menambah baikkan blog TUN dengan apa yang mungkin, blog TUN akan berjaya mengantikan media yang ada, insyallah boleh mencapai ke 200,000 perhari. Pengaruhnya akan luar biasa.
c. Muatkan who online: akan kelihatan seluruh dunia mengeksess ke blog TUN, popularity blog TUN akan bertambah globally. Pengaruhnya juga akan jadi luar biasa.
d. Adakan poll terhadap apa isu semasa atau fanclub untuk kaji selidik.
e. Pada yang celik IT, emailakan nama blog chedt.com pada semua teman dan rakan. Perjelaskan kebenaran yang ada semoga semua tahu, terutama pada family kita sendiri.
f. Pada bloger yang faham akan isu semasa ini berani berdebat dengan mereka yang sudah,“Tersesat“ agar kembali ke jalur yang betul secara online.
2. PENGARUH OFFLINE:
a. Setiap seorang kita yang menyokong TUN, memaklumkan kebenaran yang kita tahu dalam blog ini kepada 2 orang saja sehari yang kita jumpa, sebulan 60 orang.
b. Dengan purata 60,000 orang pengunjung setia TUN setiap hari kini: 60 x 60,000 = 3,600,000 orang sebulan mendapat maklumat kita. Ini sudah melebihi jumlah ahli UMNO.
c. Gunakan photocopy atau ajarkan mereka yang tak tahu ke internet. Pastikan orang kampung yang selalu di gulakan oleh pihak tertentu mendapat message TUN ini. Insyallah pengaruh offline ini juga akan menjadi luar biasa.TUN akan mendapat sokongn yang luar biasa, sudah pasti.
d. Pada yang berkemampuan dan berkebolehan, menyertai perkumpulan TUN seperti yayasan perdana dan sebagainya. Menyalurkjan idea-idea TUN melalui saluran mereka sendiri. Mengunakan kepakaran mereka, at no cost kalau boleh, backing idea dan tindakan TUN demi agama bangsa dan Negara.
e. Pada ahli dan pemimpin UMNO yang sayangkan parti, bertindaklah mencari pengaruh dalam parti agar menukar pemimpin yang ada. Beranilah membuat keputusan demi agama bangsa dan Negara.
Marilah kita sama-sama bertindak dengan TUN. Lakukan sesuatu walaupun nampak kecil namun lebih baik dari tak melakukan apa seperti born loser aja. Inilah sumbangan kita kepada agama bangsa dan Negara.
Keadaan sudah parah :
Bak kata Telur Hujung Tanduk dan Retak menungu Pecah.
Salam dari Pulau Tujuh. Indonesia.
_ashar_7;50_ 25 june 2008
Email: ashar_abdullah@yahoo.com
YM : ashar_abdullah
By ashar on June 26, 2008 4:30 PM
DARI POSTED DI SNIPPET/corat coret
TUN:
Sebagai menunjukan sokongan rakyat ,
terhadap TUN agar Pak Lah mengundurkan diri.
APA KATA TUN:
Mulai 1 julai 2008 kita lakukan “bantahan senyap untuk Pak Lah” dengan:
1) Memakai pin ribbon warna putih , atau
2) Menaikan bendera putih di kereta, di motor depan rumah, depan kedai dan pejabat dll
Marilah kita sama-sama sokong dan bertindak dengan TUN.
Lakukan segera, cari pengaruh sebanyaknya, seperti dalam komen saya dalam article PERPADUAN.
Mulakan hari ini, kalau boleh sekarang juga.
Buktikan suara rakyat boleh berkuasa: Malaysia Boleh..!!!!
Inilah sumbangan kita kepada agama bangsa dan Negara.
Keadaan sudah parah :
Bak kata Telur Hujung Tanduk dan Retak menungu Belah…
Salam dari perantau
_ashar_4;29_ 26 june 2008
Email: ashar_abdullah@yahoo.com
YM : ashar_abdullah
Angkatan Lancang Kuning Nusantara
SEPERTI KOMENTAR VENDETA JUGA,
SELEPAS KUMPULKAN SUARA RAYAT MULAI 1 JULY 2008 INI, KITA ADAKAN KEMUNCAKNYA PADA HARI KEBANGSAAN DENGAN MENGIBARKAN BENDERA JALUR GEMILANG DAN BENDERA PUTIH SEBAGAI PROTEST. INI SATU MESSAGE YANG KUAT KEPADA PEMIMPIN SEKARANG TERUTAMA KEPADA PERWAKILAN UMNO. TINDAKAN SUSULAN BOLEHLAH TUN FIKIRKAN UNTUK KE PERINGKAT YANG LEBIH TINGGI.
INI RASANYA TINDAKAN YANG SELAMAT DAN AMAN YANG BOLEH RAKYAT LAKUKAN DALAM MENGUBAH SEJARAH POLITIK MALAYSIA.
BERTINDAK SEKARANG..
DEMI AGAMA BANGSA DAN NEGARA.
SALAM PERJUANGAN
M. AMIRUL
By KopiboyAuthor Profile Page on June 27, 2008 6:02 PM
Yeeha! Love to read your articles! Take care Tun! We support you!
By cucuajiakil on June 27, 2008 6:06 PM
You are so right YM Tun. It sure smacks of a personal grudge and the sheer timing, given the current turn of event, certainly cloaks something more sinister. From the outset I sensed there was more to it than meets the eye.Your blog has certainly served in providing an alternative source of information, a constant reminder to take what you read these days with a pinch of salt.
By bob on June 27, 2008 6:10 PM
Dear Tun,
You made my day! Congratulations for putting up a clearer perspective. A spade is still a spade then.
By fajar on June 27, 2008 6:16 PM
Teruskan menulis Tun kalau boleh hari-hari ada perkara baru, Saya baca dan buka blog Tun tiap hari.
Kelmarin tu tak ada artikel baru, saya rasa rindu pulak..
By Dr Novandri Hasan BasriAuthor Profile Page on June 27, 2008 6:20 PM
Salam Tun,
In your press statement in September 2006, you’ve said,
“Removal of a judge requires a decision by his peers as required by the Constitution, so we have to abide by the Constitution. The Agong thought that it was just a matter of dismissal by me.”
“I don’t have the power to dismiss anybody, any judge.”
You’ve clearly mentioned your stand and procedure. And they don’t have any ground to accuse you.
By Mohd Naim on June 27, 2008 6:21 PM
Yg Bhg. Tun,
Syabas!! You have once again upright the truth. I feel so relief by this revelation and proud of you as the true peoples’ Hero. Age aside, you’re better by the day and at your best when cornered. A quality of a True Champion. They should know better than to mess with you.
PLEASE COME BACK AS OUR PM. WE, THE COUNTRY NEED YOU TO LEAD US.
By Dr Novandri Hasan BasriAuthor Profile Page on June 27, 2008 6:21 PM
Salam Tun,
In your press statement in September 2006, you’ve said,
“Removal of a judge requires a decision by his peers as required by the Constitution, so we have to abide by the Constitution. The Agong thought that it was just a matter of dismissal by me.”
“I don’t have the power to dismiss anybody, any judge.”
You’ve clearly mentioned your stand and procedure. And they don’t have any ground to accuse you.
By delCapo on June 27, 2008 6:21 PM
Well written!
Over to you, Ian Chin… you started the fire & kept coming.. now lets see your blaze of glory!
Tun, I may not always agree with everything you have done politically… but the personal admiration of your character, your wit & your aura is unquestioned.
Keep shooting ‘em down!
By Yunus Alias on June 27, 2008 6:22 PM
Assalamualaikum YABhg Tun Dr Haji Mahathir,
Alhamdullillah Tun telah patahkan salah satu serangan yang dibuat untuk memburukkan Tun.
Sekarang kita lihat apa kata:
Zaid Ibrahim (orang yang tersangat benci terhadap Tun dan memang tak layak jadi menteri).
Bagaimana dengan Karpal Singh ?? tak mahu buat repot Polis ke terhadap Ian Chin ? atau nak tarik balik repot polis yang dibuat menuduh Tun? Malulah sikit, nama saje peguam yang berkelibar, tapi yang sebenarnya tidak langsung berkelibar.
Karpal Singh adalah opportunist yang paling jahat di muka bumi ini(Di samping George Bush yang anti Islam sama lah mereka berdua ni). Beliau adalah orang yang pertama membawa perkara Anwar Al Juburi (AAJ) di Parlimen dan disokong oleh Pak Lawak PAS Mat Sabu menuntut Tun ambil tindakan terhadap Anwar, apabila (AAJ) dituduh di mahkamah, Karpal Singh adalah salah seorang dari bilangan peguam yang membela AAJ. Chit busuk punya loyar. Boleh tak kita tuntut agar DYMM SPB YDA melucut kerakyatan Karpal Singh dan hantar di balik ke Punjab tengok di boleh hidup ke di sana.
Majlis Peguam Ambiga? - Tidak kah anda rasa malu menuduh Tun secara melulu? Tidak kah Majlis Peguam hendak menuntut agar Pak Lah & Co tubuh Suruhanjaya Tribunal untuk menyiasat kes ini?
Kami mendesak agar Suruhanjaya Tribunal ditubuhkan untuk menyiasat Hakim yang tidak bertanggungjawab ini.
Saya rasa kini banyak lagi fail-fail “persendirian” surbordinate Tun yang di simpan oleh Tun sebagai “peluru”. Adakah lagi Ministers atau ex Ministers yang berani menuduh Tun? Cubalah terutama nya Nazri Aziz (Ketua Samseng BN). Nak tunggu Tun londeh dan tembak pasal dia pulak. Dia ingat usia Tun melepasi 80 tahun dah nyanyok kut tak boleh mengingati peristiwa lampau…… cubalah Nazri cuba kalau berani. Budak ni Memang budak biadap.
seperti kata Nazri Aziz dalam wawancara di TV Tun bukan pemimpin negara ini lagi so who cares (or to that effect)!
Ayahnda Tun,
Senaraikan tindakan yang perlu rakyat jelata ambil untuk menjatuhkan Perdana Menteri Munafik ini. Kami sedia menurutinya.
Hamba rakyat mendoakan agar Tun dapat kembali memimpin kami. Kami perlukan Tun, Tun masih relevan.
Wasallam
By fatamorgana on June 27, 2008 6:25 PM
Salam Tun,
Ingat kata2 Hang Jebat Tun,
“PATAH SAYAP BERTONGKATKAN PARUH, GUNUNG KU DAKI KU DAKI JUA”.
Semuga sentiasa diberkati dan dilindungi ALLAH.
By anak_malaysia on June 27, 2008 6:35 PM
Asalamualaikum Tun,
saya percaya dan saya yakin, apa yg Tun kata dan apa yg Tun buat sblm, semasa dan selepas mjd PM, Tun tidak main hentam kromo saja. Tun seorg pemikir dan semestinya apabila Tun nak kata atau buat apa2, Tun akan ambil kira jugak tentang masa depan. Pastinya bila org ungkit balik dan org tuduh mcm2 kat Tun selepas mjd PM tentang apa yg Tun telah buat, Tun pasti dipihak yg benar dan bg mereka itu pasti Tun akn buka pekung mereka yg akn mendedahkan agenda mereka.
sebagai pemikir dan pelaksana yg tegas langkah dan tindakan Tun tak akn nampak sumbang. kita juga tau bhw di kalangan org barat, mereka memang hormat dan takut dgn Tun sbb bila mereka menghentam Tun pastinya Tun juga akn buka tembelang mereka. sebagaimana dulunya Tun pernah mengkritik USA mjd proksi Israel atau zionis yahudi, lalu barat dan yahudi mengecam Tun namun kecaman mereka itu tidak mampu menggugat kedudukan Tun dan negara kerana saya percaya sebagai seorg pemikir pastinya rahsia dan sejarah silam yahudi serta pakatan US-yahudi ini bila2 masa saja Tun boleh dedahkan pd dunia. dan sbgai rakyat negara ini kita tahu bahawa Malaysia dibwh Tun mjdkn negara ini contoh serta dihormati oleh negara2 Islam, negara membangun dan negara dunia ke-3. pastinya barat tidak berani menjolok sarang tebuan tp mereka sudah tau bila2 masa Tun pasti berundur, jd mereka biarkn saja krn hanya masa yg akn mjatuhkan kedudukan serta kelantangan Malaysia apabila diambilalih oleh PM yg lembik dan lembab yg boleh dicucuk hidung mcm lembu sprti skrg ini.
By nookvillage on June 27, 2008 6:36 PM
Tun,
If Justice Chin claims he could be influenced by you or any other persons, in the first place he is not fit and proper to be a Judge.He should not be allowed to hear any other cases.Better still for the interest of the judicial system he should quit.
By cakkuncak on June 27, 2008 6:44 PM
YAB Tun,
Thank you for the explanation. The judge mentioned deserves it.
It will be interesting to see the what the self appointed “Justiceman”(Zaid Ibrahim) will say and do now to ‘cover’ for this Judge ‘humiliation’…ex-gratia payment?
Thanks Tun !! I feel GOOD!!
By aajAuthor Profile Page on June 27, 2008 6:46 PM
Judges now also claim themselves as “bangsawan”. Orang bangsawan mana ada buat salah. geng pak lah, zaid, nazri aziz semua ni bangsawan, rakyat biasa ni digelar ‘rakyat jelata’.
Stupido…
By haidaan on June 27, 2008 6:48 PM
Dearest Tun,
Hats off Tun,very clear and precise cronologies.Your foes are trying
every little minute things to pin you down.
Ian Chin is the flip flop judge just like the leader.Today he says
something the next day he say different things.
Plse the Umno people save the Malays for the future generations.
Many had been said about Tun for not been Malay,well Tun is much more
concerned for the Malays than the pure Malays themselves.
Please Tun do anything to help us the Malays,I am behind you Tun for
my children future..
Keep on blogging.
Ya Allah panjangkan umur dan berilah kesihatan yang baik kepada Tun
dan keluarga supaya beliau boleh menolong menyelamatkan Malaysia dari
segala kepincangan kerajaan sekarang.
.
By zulkarnainAuthor Profile Page on June 27, 2008 6:49 PM
Welldone Tun. Very detailed info. I pity the fool Joker Chin who think he can smear Tun name and get away with it. How can such immoral nitwit get to be a judge? He must have buy his way in.
Take care of your health Tun. You are Malaysia’s hope to a better future. You had done it once. We know you can do it again.
By megatPanjiAlam on June 27, 2008 6:55 PM
Salam YBerbahgia TDM sekeluarga
Saya sebenarnya kagum dengan pemikiran jauh YBG TDM, saya sangat yakin setiap tindakan YBG TDM dibuat setelah difikir dengan mendalam dan tujuannya adalah untuk rakyat Malaysia. Kalau Nabi sangat kasihkan umatnya, saya rasakan begitulah YBG TDM sangat kasihkan bangsanya,tetapi apakan daya, mereka tidak dapat memahaminya.
Saya berdoa semuga YBG akan tetap sabar melayani segala tohmahan mendatang dan mengambil msasa yang mencukupi untuk menjawab segala tuduhan yang dilemparkan.
Akhirnya, semuga YBG TDM sentiasa dalam lindungan Allah selalu hendaknya. amin..
By antimamakAuthor Profile Page on June 27, 2008 6:56 PM
Tun:
Tun ibaratkan sebagai helai kain yang putih, telah dinodai oleh titik hitam. Baguslah, kalau boleh tun cuba memperbetulkan sistem kehakiman dengan adil dan saksama. Tub haruslah menarik Ian Chin masuk ke mahkamah dan menonjolkan diri di makamah, biarlah rakyat dapat dengar cerita yang benar.
Tapi saya terkejut bila membaca article tun ni, semata mata Tun sebagai penguam yang berkelayakan, cara penyampaiannya sebagai penguam tinggi, saya menyesyaki betulkah article ini ditulis tun sendiri? macam lain bau nya!
Kesimpulannya,
Biarlah perjuangan Tun untuk membuktikan kerajaan sedang memperburukkan nama Tun, biarlah tun memperjuangkan untuk kesaksamaan sistem kehakiman yang lama luput oleh tun.
http://www.antimahathir.blogspot.com/
By abdul on June 27, 2008 6:57 PM
Dear Tun,
Thank you for your revealation of the true colour of J. Ian Chin. I almost got carried away by J. Ian Chin’s confession that he is as clean as a whistle. Well if one is a whisle, it needs someone else to blow that whistle!
Although aging in age, one can see Tun is still a heavy weight, and it is not easy for anyone to brush him off “as an old man who is nyanyok”.
I propose that Tun, besides being adviser to Petronas, Proton, Langkawi Development, it is timely that Tun also be made advisor to the Malaysian Judiaciary.
I think we could have won the Pulau Batu had Tun been part of our delegate to the World Court.
By HighFlyerAuthor Profile Page on June 27, 2008 7:01 PM
Dearest Tun;
Saya amat bersetuju dengan merongwangsa yang merasa amat kagum dengan kesetiaan Datuk Paduka Ibrahim Ali yang sentiasa berada di pihak Tun dalam apa keadaan pun. I would also like to add that I also believe that the people who are on your side now are really sincere because they are very well aware that you are not in a position to reward them in any way. Their loyalty to you is genuine. I am sure most of the politicians in power at present are envious of you because I am sure they know (I hope) that the people around them who declare their undivided loyalty are only fighting for their political survival!
Tun, you are my inspiration and I am damn lucky to live throughout your premiership. I cried when you announced that you were going to step down.
Wassalam
By awetmuda on June 27, 2008 7:06 PM
Ulil Amri tersayang:
Been a long time since I last wrote to you.
Bravo!! You are still the greatest leader in the world. What we want to know now is how to get rid of the present PM, the one that you have wrongly chosen. Please let us know. We will follow. This is what we want most from you, before its toooooo late. Its important.
Last but not least, jaga diri baik-baik dan senyum selalu. Minta halalkan segala penatlelah dan jasabaik yang telah disumbangkan selama ini untuk kami.
Salam sayang juga untuk serikandi Siti Hasmah. We love you a lot.
Regards
By zmokhtar@gmail.com on June 27, 2008 7:08 PM
As I have posted elsewhere when the first salvo was fired,there is more in this explosive episode, and now, Tun, you have done the right thing by making this disclosure.
There’s a saying “those in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones” that perfectly applies here. The “learned” judge has to learn some more.
Please don’t stop here, Tun. We want to see where all this will take us. The trail may lead to powerful doors. We also want to see who blinks first.
By takretibodekAuthor Profile Page on June 27, 2008 7:12 PM
Salam Ayhnda…
and all bloggers..
Dah namanya manusia..x kira sapa pun (kecuali mereka yg terpilih olehNYA) ttp punya perasaan utk mmbalas dendam..hati2 semua..tengok kiri, kanan, atas, bawah, tepi, sipi…ingat hari ni dia baik esok dia boleh jadi musuh ketat anda… berpada2 dalam mmberi kpercayaan..
Doktor?..majistret?..mentri mentra?..suma cerita dalam poket Ayhda..sapa brani mariii…jgan ingat kita nih terlalu bersih dan jujur..
salam buat smua..
p/s. Ayhda..take care of yrself..
By Alang Mat Yasin on June 27, 2008 7:24 PM
Assalamualaikum.
Teruskan Tun.Berani kerana benar.Musuh-musuh Tun cuba menggunakan segala peluang dan orang-orang bodoh yang berkepentingan peribadi untuk menghancurkan Tun.Muga Allah menyelamatkan Tun dan Malaysia.
By RinggitMalaysia on June 27, 2008 7:24 PM
Yb Tun,
I always respect your comments and all the rebutting to allegations that were made to you. I’m not just blindly admire with the words you putting on but the facts that you have given on all your comments. Eventhough I never went thoroughly all the facts but it does make sense and there are basis to all the answers.
Logic and supported with facts will definately guide me to judge person or ’s and this in case you’re the one. I did consider the facts given and try to put things related to all the accusation that made to you, but the timing, purposes and the commonsense are just not in place, it became doubtful. To me all those accusations to you more towards defending rather than attacking. Acctually your rivals had loose the war before even they started it. It’s just they are save (at least for now) by the status of being ruler and just waiting to fall apart.
What I’m concern more is about the country future, our country. Planning and decissions making by the present ruler are too undemanding, effortless, seems they are not interested in solving problems or just to try find the easiest way to run the country economy without having the thought of consequences that will jeoperdise our country. They have mention about borrowings and this must be done due to the shortage of fund in the country. Shortage of funds? From whom the borrowings wiil be, I’m not sure (Please not the IMF)and to the borrowers,its oppurnity. If this happens, Malaysia will not be Malaysia ever after.
To YB Tun, semoga Allah bersama-sama orang yang benar.
Salam
By joehenry on June 27, 2008 7:26 PM
Tun, scum like Ian Chin should be removed from not only the judiciary but also this country. He is like a monkey under the cloak of a human being. Not only did he bring disrepute to the judiciary, he also brought shame to his own country and the worse is that he never felt ashame of it and even attempted to shift the blame to you by making use of the opportunity now when everybody’s mind was poisoned by the Lingam’s video’s findings that linked you to the so-called judiciary scandal purportedly started as far back as 1988. I recall Justice NH Chan’s remark in one of his landmark cases where he described the state of our judiciary “in the rotten state of Denmark”. I cannot find a more apt and telling remark to describe the current state of affair involving Ian Chin and the judiciary.
By GOMO on June 27, 2008 7:27 PM
Asalammualaikum buat Tun dan Isteri tercinta. semoga sihat hendakNya.
Tun memang BEST!!! saya tak nampak buat masa sekarang ni penganti yang betul-betul BERKALIBER untuk menganti Tun sebagai seorang PEJUANG!!!
Rasanya hendak sangat Tun kembali semula ke kancah politik.
Tapi bila saya fikir balik dengan waras, saya rasa Tun perlu menumpukan perhatian kepada keluarga dan yang paling penting kesihatan Tun!!!
Takpa sekarang ni Tun BALUN DAN PULUN dieorang cukup-cukup!!!
bongkar segala yang pak lah NGOK dan menantu IBLIS serta keroni-keroni kayu api tu. Biar panas punggung IBLIS DAN SYAITAN tu!!!
Dan saya amat berharap sangat kiranya Tun dapat memberikan kami rakyat cara yang paling berkesan untuk SINGKIRKAN PAK LAH NGOK DAN KERONI-KERONINYA!!!
sesungguhnya kami rakyat akan sentiasa mendoakan Tun,Isteri dan keluarga agar sihat hendakNya!!!
KAMI TETAP MENGHARGAI SEGALA PERJUANGAN TUN SELAMA INI!!!
DATO SERI DR MAHATHIR MOHAMAD UNTUK SELAMA-LAMANYA BAGI KAMI RAKYAT MALAYSIA!!!!
By Mohamed Jack on June 27, 2008 7:34 PM
SAYANG TUN
BRAVO!BRAVO! WELL DONE TUN Rentap TUN Rentaappp, whack the burger whaaack…
Wherre arrre u Karrpal. Arrre u goroing tor PORlis Stersyen?
May Allah Bless You & Family, Sihat Walafiat
By zaman on June 27, 2008 7:35 PM
Tun just asking,
Will ian chinn received ex-gratia???
By zaki_77 on June 27, 2008 7:37 PM
If anyone thinks that AAB will initiate a tribunal is mistaken. It is not in AAB’s interest to be seen to be influenced by Tun, he is an incompetent fool who wants to make his own ‘mark’ on the judiciary and the so-called reforms which he recites as a mantra nowadays.
It should not even surprise anyone if AAB alreay knows about Chin’s misdemeanours but simply ignores them because he does not want another headache with all the other problems he is trying to deal with.
On the same note, I must say that Najib also does not fill me with confidence and I don’t think he will make a good PM. Where AAB is incompetent, NR is lethargic and does not inspire confidence in others.
By kamal ahmad on June 27, 2008 7:41 PM
Salam Yang Amat Berbahagia Tun dan Toh Puan. Many times in your PM tenure-ship you defended us from external and internal malevolence, you believed in us even when we don’t believe in our selves. You pushed us into shiny examples for the whole world to see and we stood tall under your stewardship of this blessed land. Do those who today freely throw all these misguided charges at you- for a second- for an honest blink- think that we the public actually buy it? Think again is my advice to them. Look at the followers of your blog both within the country and outside the country, look at the figures- you are still our leader Tun. Once upon a time, many of us who had established ourselves overseas were summoned home by a great man. To come home and to help build this country into the prominence it is today. We embraced your pioneering vision and left our comfy plush existence to return home and toil in our Motherland. You made us proud then and you make us even prouder today Tun. Keep on the struggle, you are never alone and you will never walk alone. We are your silent majority. Always have and always will be. You are father to us.
By man79Author Profile Page on June 27, 2008 7:43 PM
Assalamualaikum……..Teruskan usaha murni,kami akan sentiasa menyokong Tun dari belakang.JASA MU TETAP DI KENANG….
By tee kay pee on June 27, 2008 7:44 PM
PADAN MUKA MEHHH!!!…
ADA SIAPA-SIAPA LAGI MAU JOLOK SARANG TEBUAN MEEHH?!!….
By ssr on June 27, 2008 7:46 PM
I wish the blog writer and the regular patrons of this blog will read the latest letter in Malaysiakini by Batman titled ‘22 fiascos in 22 years’. It writes very respectfully about all that was wrong in the years preceding the present leadership.
The self righteous statements that are repeated time and again in this blog is pure nauseating stuff. For a start the writer probably should explain all these fiascos and stop diverting issues with his usual cunningness and deception.
Someone who had destroyed the fabric of the society and took us through a downward spiralling journey in terms of race relations and many other aspects of our life does not have the right to wage this self righteous war on others.
By anak merdeka on June 27, 2008 7:51 PM
assalamualikum TUN………
isu perundangan menjadi sensasi sejak akhir2 ni,hakim dpt ex-gratia tanpa sebab,perbicaraan klip lingam dan lawyer2 pun sibuk bg statement mengatakan TUN mencampuri urusan mereka……kenapa semua ini timbul secara tiba2 shj…tentu ada udang disebalik batu…kalau tidak masakan semua ni terkeluar…pd hemat sy ada seorg menggunakan pengaruh menghasut golongan yg dianggap sbg intelektual ini mengetuk gendang terhadap TUN…supaya TUN melatah BUT kita org tahu u’re not like that…….cara TUN menangani satu demi satu tuduhan serta cara TUN membalasnya menunjukkan betapa matangnya TUN….
hakim yg menghina Agong pun dpt duit,mn letak prinsip rukunegara kita,yg kita selalu bc dr sekolah rendah sampai menengah”kEPERCAYAAN KPD RAJA DAN SULTAN”……
sy percaya hakim2 yg hidup dlm kemewahan ini lupa semua itu sehingga sanggup membelakangkan ketua negara(more detail bc apa yg TUN tulis sebab pemecatan ketua hakim yg tak sedar diri itu)
TUN,sy amat yakin selepas ini ada lg golongan profesional yg akan melemparkan tuduhan buta tuli kepada TUN…….namun TUN tahu untuk mematahkannya…..kan,he…..he
kami,rakyat yg tak cerdik pun hairan,siapa yg pilih anggota suruhanjaya diraja yg menyiasat kes video klip lingam….kenapa tidak dibuat inkuiri terbuka walaupun kes ini berprofile tinggi
bg kami apa saja yg berkaitan dgn negara biarlah telus perbicaraannya
apa yg dapat sy katakan,pemrintah memainkan sentimen drpd golongan profesional ini untuk MERACUNI pemikiran rakyat,yg mengatakan pemimpin terdahulu bersalah mencampuri urusan peringkat eksekutif negara,KONFRANTASI MUNGKIN TERJADI SEKIRANYA PEMIMPIN SEKARANG TERUS MEWUJUDKAN PENGANIAYAAN KPD TUN……SY RELA MENJADI PENGEBOM BERANI MATI UNTUK TUN,DEMI BANGSA DAN NEGARA
WASALAM
By nasirizal on June 27, 2008 7:51 PM
assalamualaikum …..
bagi saya semua2 pemberi2 komen yang di atas dan sebelum ni datang dari hati yang ikhlas memandangkan tun sekarang dah takde apa2 jawatan pun dalam kerajaan. kita orang ni la muka2 yang bermaruah saya rasa. sokong dengan keikhlasan dan sokong takde keikhlasan bezanya menentukan tahap maruah seseorang itu. jadi marilah insan2 bermaruah semua kita sokong tun agar dapat menumpaskan kerajaan yang tak bermaruah sekarang ni…..insya’allah.
By zali lampai on June 27, 2008 7:56 PM
By Neil on June 27, 2008 5:13 PM
Tun,Now you can remember.
KOMEN SAYA:-
Awat tak tengok ker sidang media tu?? Kan Tun cakap dia dapat dokumen tu. Pihak kerajaan pun dapat dokumen tu. So, ini bukanlah soal ingat atau lupa tapi mendapat bukti dari sumber-sumber lain.
By antimamak on June 27, 2008 6:56 PM
Tun:
Tapi saya terkejut bila membaca article tun ni, semata mata Tun sebagai penguam yang berkelayakan, cara penyampaiannya sebagai penguam tinggi, saya menyesyaki betulkah article ini ditulis tun sendiri? macam lain bau nya!
KOMEN SAYA:-
Kan atas tu Press Statement. So, kenalah ada bantuan dari pihak guaman yang mana ianya berkenaan hal undang-undang. Pikiaq lah sikit.
By surah on June 27, 2008 7:57 PM
Dear Tun,
Nampak sangat la sekarang ini perjuangan adalah lebih kepada perjuangan kepentingan individu/kroni.Semua orang akan mengambil kesempatan di atas kelemahan perdana menteri sekarang yang agak kurang akalnya.Nescaya NEGARA akan huru hara kiranya pemimpin sekarang mengamalkan dasar yang kabur dan pentingkan diri/kroni tanpa mengambil kira kesengsaraan rakyat.
i salute u Tun..i respect u… take care
By nikdublin.. on June 27, 2008 7:58 PM
Tun…
To my surprised and I am sure that you are too with Mr.Karpal’s statement today. He can be a monster and an angel at one time. Anyway, thank God for the statement from him that might give more pressure on Ian Chin and Paklala…especially that ‘tunggul’ zaid!
salam hormat.
By sangsetia on June 27, 2008 8:02 PM
Salam Tun,
My do’a for Tun, may Allah bless you always and be prepared to face tha attacks from your enemies. May Allah protects you always.
Ian Chin lepas ni mungkin akan cuba counter attack - so be prepared always.
Wassalam.
By tunman on June 27, 2008 8:12 PM
Tun,
Inilah kes songkok pesok dek lonjak awak. The government really have to take action against him to make their transparency policy transparent.
It will be more transparent if the judge receive his ex-gratia or whatever.
By ketam on June 27, 2008 8:14 PM
SSR, the blog writer is our beloved ex Prime Minister who has been modernising our beloved country for 22 years. It was the like of you that have always wanted change for the country because for the sake of Change. Reformasi konon. Now it is reformed to one of the worse country in South East Asia by Pak Lah .Even if Anwar is on the realm the same thing will apply because he only think of himself. Do you like it. Or the Malaysia Kini are afraid that we the common people shifted our blog readings to chedet.com instead of the nonsense put forward by your likes. I’ve made a comment to Malaysia Kini before and nothing came out. See… they are a coward and afraid of critisme.
By ANAK-DAMIT on June 27, 2008 8:20 PM
Rakyat Malaysia !! tunjukkan undi tidak percaya anda kepada paklah…
http://www.afundi-paklah.blogspot.com
buktikan suara rakyat sudah tidak percaya terhadap pak lah !!
By Onlooker on June 27, 2008 8:21 PM
YABhg Tun Dr. Mahathir,
I refer to your press statement dated June 26, 2008 in response to Judge Ian Chin’s allegations towards Dr Mahathir.
‘19. It became obvious that Chin J was biased against DSK. Yet he did not reveal his father’s and brother’s arrest during the time of Tun Mustafa’s Government and his belief that Syed Kechik who was adviser to Tun Mustafa was responsible for this arrest when hearing the case concerned.’
Thank you for telling us in the above sentence that Tun Mustafa’s Government (a Barisan Nasional Government during early 1970s) allowed a businessman from Peninsular Malaysia, Dato Syed Kechik, to be responsible for the arrest of the father and the brother of Judge Ian Chin. Your confirmation that a businessman was allowed to intervene in the government’s decision on a police arrest had really enlightened us. This clearly showed that cronyism in Barisan Nasional Government could be dated back to the days before Tun had become a cabinet member. Therefore Tun should not be blamed for starting cronyism in Malaysia since Tun just followed the tradition of Barisan Nasional that had been passed down from Tun’s predecessor in the Government Administration of Malaysia.
If Tun still have time to write addtional blogs, I would appreciate it if Tun could kindly write something on the pros and cons of cronyism so that the younger generations could also be further enlightened and taught to adopt an acceptable cronyism for a better effective government administration.
‘34. This reflects the character of the man who presides over our courts and dispenses “justice”. He makes use of his position as a judge and the courts to take revenge for alleged actions against members of his family.’
The above sentence indicates that Tun has made a serious accusation on Judge Ian Chin. I wish to advise Tun that by accusing Judge Ian Chin for making ‘use of his position as a judge and the courts to take revenge for alleged actions against members of his family,’ Tun can actually call for yourself a small trouble if you are being sued in the court for libel or slander.
‘19. It became obvious that Chin J was biased against DSK. Yet he did not reveal his father’s and brother’s arrest during the time of Tun Mustafa’s Government and his belief that Syed Kechik who was adviser to Tun Mustafa was responsible for this arrest when hearing the case concerned.’
The above sentence showed that Tun had made use of personal judgement to conclude that Judge Chin ‘was biased against Dato Syed Kechik.’ As a matter of fact, many people would not simply believe in one side story that Dato Syed Kechik could have so much influence on Tun Mustafa that could further lead to Tun Mustafa’s appointing Dato Syed Kechik to hold responsibility for the arrest of Judge Chin’s father and brother. Likewise, many people would also not simply believe in one side story that Tun’s decision in making the candidate choice of Chief Justice had strongly been influenced by the business tycoon Tan Sri Vincent Tan, who also happened to be the good friend of Tun.
Most Malaysians understood that Tun Mustafa could be made an analogy to Tun Dr. Mahathir: both were political strong men who were capable to impose their strong will on many others within their circle of life. No matter how politically strong Tun was in the past, those days of big political power had already become history in the sweet memoir and those glorious days would never come back to Tun again. If Tun still prefers to live in the past, then I would rather advise Tun that it would be much wiser not to use your vilest tongue to pass poisonous remark on others, lest Tun might become a tough question for Allah someday in the future on whether a decision should be made to send Tun for punishment with tongue cut-off in the purgatory in the last bereavement of Tun.
By Pak JokoAuthor Profile Page on June 27, 2008 8:28 PM
Kami sokong Tun Mahathir.
Sekali lagi mereka akan terperanjat beruk akan tindak balas dari TUN.
Hidup TUN MAHATHIR
By jamesmiely_S2 on June 27, 2008 8:29 PM
salam tun&family
dn`t give face to em tun, belasah em all till shutup.
semoga sihat sokmo2.
By Koh Lipe on June 27, 2008 8:32 PM
Salam Ayahanda yang disayangi,
Teruskanlah perjuangan menegakkan keadilan demi pembangunan dan kesejahteraan negara.
Keadaan negara kini ke arus kemusnahan yang dilakukan oleh beberapa pemimpin yang rakus haruslah dihapuskan dan tindakan Ayahanda ini amatlah dihargai seluruh warganegara.
SISTEM KEHAKIMAN KINI DICEMARI OLEH PEMIMPIN-PEMIMPIN HAPRAK PUTRAJAYA DAN MEREKA HARUSLAH BERTANGGUNGJAWAB JIKA NEGARA KITA PORAK-PERANDA.
Kam Nan
By abdul on June 27, 2008 8:34 PM
Dear Tun,
I was initially amazed when J. Ian Chin coined the words in his attempt to slam his fellow judge, who planted a seat behind Tun’s seat for the group picture, and who also obediently acknowledged to Tun “I would always be behind you, sir”.
It was a marvellous description of the whole scenario, and probably Shakespeare would have fallen off from his seat on reading J. I Chin’s remarks.
Whilst, at the same time J. I Chin did not realise that he was making ‘an invitation to treat” of his story about the ‘boot camp” for Dolah and his generals who were then in Sarawak.
It is nice to potray one’s independence but at the same time trying to be dependent. In this case I would rather coin as ” I would always be with you, sir”
By cariidea on June 27, 2008 8:40 PM
Assalamualaikum
Apa kata lepas ni kita buat kelab penyokong Tun Mahathir. Kita buat uniform khas dan pada hari tertentu kita pakai dan tunjuk bahawa Tun mempunyai ramai penyokong yang setia berdiri di belakang Tun. Sapa yang ada kemahiran IT boleh buat dalam website, kita pakat - pakat register online pastu buat gathering dan pakat fikir apa yang patut kita buat untuk membetulkan keadaan yang maha kelam kabut sekarang ni. Bila kita bersatu baru kita kuat, kita jangan cakap, tapi kita buat. Kalau kita dok bertekak tanpa tunjuk taring tak boleh ubah keadaan. Nak ubah cara berhemah kena tunggu 4 tahun lagi. Bila ada kelab kita boleh rancang macam macam aktiviti. Ramai bloggers dekat sini yang profesional dan mempunyai banyak kemahiran cuma kita tidak bersatu dan menggerakkan power kita. Dah banyak kita maki hamun,cerca,tapi tak boleh betulkan keadaan sebab dia tau Melayu Mudah Lupa.
Ayoh..teruskan perjuangan kita…
Hidup Tun…
By rossi on June 27, 2008 8:41 PM
Salam TUN, tumpang lalu…
To blogger SSR,
I like what i read here, go somewhere else to promote malaysiakini!
If you don’t like what u read here, go somewhere else.
I love chedet.com
sesshhhh…….
Salam TUN, thanks.
By akitekinchina on June 27, 2008 8:44 PM
Salam Tun,
Great going! As said by many before me, Chin J must be pissing in his pants right now. Yeah, I was educated in Blighty too, for like 6+2 years but I never subscribed to be more British than the Brits themselves as this bloke that goes by the name and title of ‘Justice ian Chin’…..Man…he’s way off base and such a dumbass to be carrying a knife, yet starting the gunfight! Once again, kudos to you Sir!
Antimamak : Tun Dr.Mahathir is a scholar amongst other things. He’s not just a Prime Minister,Doctor, Statesman and a politician per se. He’s more than the sum of his parts and with the experiences he has managing a country such as Malaysia for 22 bloody years, it’s of no surprise to me and most other folks here that he can speak and/or write like any litigator/advocate or solicitor if and when he wants to. Unlike you,my dear how do pronounce that..er..An-tie or An-tee something; from the stupid and senseless and/or baseless arguments and/or postings whether it be here or on your blogsite which gives us the impression that you don’t have any substance in synaptic cerebrum and cerebellum corellation whatsoever…Just refrain from posting here and instead spend your time and energy into championing the causes and/or rhetorics of DSAAB or worse still, DSAI. Wassalam.
By SHAZAuthor Profile Page on June 27, 2008 8:46 PM
With respect Tun,
Ian Chin,
Where are you?…..
Care to comment?
Next time better watch your back before opening your fat mouth ahhh… Make sure you’re clean, then whatever your claim will be taken into consideration (this goes to all you chorus singers too!)
My dearest Tun Mahathir has got all his bullets. Should wear better shield next time Judge!
By permatasabah on June 27, 2008 8:47 PM
siap!! ian chin kena kung fu oleh Tun…ni tak sabar nak dengar dan tengok apa jenis kung fu yang digunakan oleh dollah dan geng-gengnya nak guna untuk balas Tun punya statment!!! silap-silap kung fu kulut..hehehe kalau tak pun kung fu mabuk..hehehe
apa pun tahniah kepada Tun atas pendedahan ini..teruskan usaha Tun.. kami sentiasa berdiri teguh di belakang Tun (macam pernah dengar aje ayat tu..)
By ray77light on June 27, 2008 8:55 PM
To ssr
Why don’t you reveal who Batman is? If he/she has the guts state his/her real identity.
We chose to show our thanks and support to Tun and you have a problem with that?
By ayeharis on June 27, 2008 9:00 PM
Dear Tun,
Simply powerful statement…I believe in you,people believe in you…ayeharis
By Yunus Alias on June 27, 2008 9:09 PM
Assalamualakum YBhg Tun
The people are waiting for this, n congrats for the statements which revealed the truth of Justice Ian. Thank you to Datuk Ibrahim Ali for the police report made.
What say u Zaid Ibrahim? Will u insists the Tribunal Commission to investigate the wrongdoings of Ian Chin to be set up? You really hates our beloved Tun don’t you?
Karpal Singh, will you lodge a police report pertaining to the wrongdoings of Ian? Awak lah orang yang pertama membangkitkan isu Anwar AlJuburi(AAJ) di Parlimen dan disokong oleh PAS Clown Mat Sabu Allawaki. Bila AAJ dihadapkan di mahkamah, awaklah salah seorang dari barisan peguam yang membela AAJ, tak malu ke? Sepatutnya awak ni ditarik balik kerakyatan negara ni dan dibuang jauh-jauh. Mungkin Tun boleh rekomen beliau dibuang ke South Pole…. duduk dengan beruang hehehe. Sikap anti Islam awak sungguh menebal…serupa dengan Bush the Chief Terrorist.
What say u Ambiga the Great President of Bar Council? I challenge u to take up this case and insist your beloved Pak Lah to set up the tribunal…only then i will respect u.
Ayahnda Tun,
Saya percaya Tun menyimpan banyak “personal file” on the present and ex Ministers. Simpan “peluru-peluru” tu Tun. Saya percaya “Budak Biadap” Nazri Aziz (yang kata Tun bukan pemimpin negara lagi and who cares for him ! or to that effect dalam wawancara di TV) tak akan berani mencabar Tun. Cakap banyak atau tuduh Tun yang bukan-bukan, minta Tun “tembak dengan peluru peluru tu” londehkan seluar dia “bior nampak anu dia yang kecut tu” hehehehe.
Kami tetap menyokong Ayahnda Tun, kami perlukan pimpinan Tun, pimpinlah kami sepertimana Tun pimpin selama 22 tahun tu.
Panggil kami untuk berhimpun dan beritahu kami cara mana strategi Tun untuk menumbangkan PM Munafik tu. Kami akan turuti. Ahli-ahli Parlimen BN yang lembik tengok tu tak boleh diharap.
Jagalah diri Tun sebaik mungkin, saya dan rakyat jelata sentiasa mendoakan kehadrat Illahi agar Tun dipanjang umor dengan kesihatan yang sempurna.
Wasallam.
By hai on June 27, 2008 9:14 PM
Judicial Independence as a Campaign Platform
Issues, such as protecting judicial independence, improving interbranch relations, and expanding outreach to the people.
Improving Judicial Selection and “Call to Action” as a blueprint for judicial election reform.
“Good judging is good politics . . . the people will support judges whom they perceive as independent even if they do not agree with particular decisions. But judges have to talk about judicial independence and make it a campaign issue.
Judges base their decisions on the facts and law presented in each individual case, not on their personal viewpoints on policy issues. Unlike other candidates, judges cannot campaign by making promises about how they’ll decide issues. Constraints are placed upon judicial candidates in all states by canons of judicial conduct, and limits are placed on a judge’s ability to sit on a case if the judge “decides” the case during a campaign. Judicial conduct also limit the political activities of judges.
The traditional view is that if a judge comments on a pending or impending case, the comments will reduce the litigants’ and the public’s confidence in the impartiality and fairness of our courts.
A “candidate for a judicial office, including an incumbent judge” shall not “announce his or her views on disputed legal or political issues.
Judges and judicial candidates can and should speak on the issue of judicial independence.
Free to Speak on Judicial Independence
Judges and candidates are legally and ethically free to speak about the critical importance of judicial independence. In any judicial-selection system, the best way to ensure judicial independence is to develop the public’s understanding of, and respect for, the concept of judicial independence. Lawyers and judges must educate the public on judicial roles and duties. Educational efforts should not be restricted to elections or times of crisis. Judges and lawyers must be community educators using a variety of tools to reach the public, the media, and the executive and legislative branches of government. Public outreach efforts promote judicial independence because they enable citizens to evaluate critical attacks on judges and to value judicial independence.
The points that should be addressed in this education effort are:
• What is judicial independence?
• Why is judicial independence important to you, the citizen?
• What are the threats to judicial independence? and
• How can judicial independence be protected?
What is judicial independence?
“The law makes a promise — neutrality. If the promise gets broken, the law as we know it ceases to exist.”
Judicial independence means that judges decide cases fairly and impartially, relying only on the facts and the law. Individual judges and the judicial branch as a whole should work free of ideological influence. Although all judges do not reason alike or necessarily reach the same decision, decisions should be based on determinations of the evidence and the law, not on public opinion polls; personal whim; prejudice or fear; or interference from the legislative or the executive branches, or private citizens or groups.
There are two types of judicial independence: decisional independence and institutional independence (sometimes called branch independence). Decisional independence refers to a judge’s ability to render decisions free from political or popular influence; decisions should be based solely on the facts of the individual case and the applicable law. Institutional independence describes the judicial branch as a separate and co-equal branch of government with the executive and legislative branches.
Any discussion of judicial independence needs, however, to be joined with a discussion of accountability.It is not only ensures the protection of rights, but also enforces responsibilities. The rule of law holds government officials accountable to those in whose name they govern to prevent abuse of power, and the judiciary is not exempt from accountability. Judges are accountable to the public to work hard, keep their dockets current, educate themselves about changes in the law, and treat each person with respect and dignity. Judges are accountable to represent the judicial branch before the public and other branches of government, and to advocate for court reform.
Why is judicial independence important to you, the citizen?
Judicial independence is a means to an end — the end is due process, a fair trial according to law. Judicial independence thus protects the litigants in court and all the people of the nation.
What are the threats to judicial independence?
Historically, threats to judicial independence have come from the legislative and executive branches. Executive and legislative leaders have at times tried to influence judicial outcomes.
Governmental threats to an independent judiciary are:
• Poor interbranch relationships among the judiciary, the legislature, and the executive, marked by a lack of communication;
• Legislative limits on or curtailment of judicial jurisdiction;
• Legislative refusal to increase judicial salaries; and
• Chronic underfunding of the judicial branch and increasing workload.
More recently, nongovernmental groups have threatened judicial independence using political, social, and economic resources to influence the selection and retention of judges.The danger is that when individuals or groups are highly organized, ideologically driven, and well funded, their self-interest in winning cases overcomes their interest in an independent judiciary.
More specific threats to judicial independence by nongovernmental groups include:
• Inappropriate threats of impeachment prompted by particular judicial decisions;
• Political threats intended to influence a judge’s decision in an individual case; and
• Misleading criticism of individual decisions.
The best judges are those who resist threats to judicial independence and actively advocate judicial independence. The basic, underlying safeguard for judicial independence is popular support of the concept.
How can judicial independence be protected?
Public education efforts about judicial independence and judicial selection face a number of challenges, including limited public knowledge of courts and judges, and limited resources to reach a broad public audience.
If judges include judicial independence as a campaign issue in their election and retention campaigns, the public will respond with an eagerness to learn more. The public’s appreciation of, and respect for, judicial independence is the best way to ensure that the judiciary will remain independent. Campaigning on judicial independence can educate both judges and the electorate on the importance of protecting fair and impartial courts.